A NEED FOR SHARING RESPONSIBILITY BY MARYAM AZAM & YAWAR HAYAT SHAH

A NEED FOR SHARING RESPONSIBILITY


The issues of bad governance have always hit Pakistan hard. Pakistan itself being a victim of terrorism along struggling with its domestic political system has faced drastic consequences. President General Musharraf era was characterized with increased centralization which gave a great set back to democracy, Institutionalization and egalitarianism. In this context the February 2008 elections gave a new hope to the people of Pakistan that democracy would bring prosperity to them. As a result despite the wave of terrorism the voting turn out was 44.9 percent. It was first time in the history of Pakistan that Prime Minister was chosen unanimously by the parliament. People gave the mandate to the political parties in such a way that they were required to collaborate with each other in the spirit of national integration and reconciliation. Pakistan People Party formed a collation government in the centre as well as in the provinces. But the commitment by the two main stream parties PPPP and PML-N on the issue of judicial crisis was not fulfilled and as a protest PML-N resigned from the federal cabinet. After the restoration of judges which was the core bone of contention between the two parties the PPPP invited PML-N to rejoin the federal government but it was not accepted. On the other hand Punjab government was dismissed and Governor Rule was imposed on Punjab thus derailing the democratic process in the province which represents almost sixty percent of the population of Pakistan. After the restoration of CM Punjab, PML-N invited PPPP to team up in the Punjab government which after some reservations is accepted by PPPP. Political parties are the carriers of demand and the backbone for a stable political system. A strong and viable federation requires mutual cooperation and accommodating behavior incorporated with the norms of shared responsibility on part of the political parties to cater the incoming issues for sustaining the fragile democratic system. Pakistan is going through its most complex phase defined by external and internal threats. In this respect instead of face saving both the main stream parties should share the responsibility of governance both at the federal and provincial level. The call for All Parties Conference is a fine proposal, but it would not bear fruitful results unless and until political parties are sincere in addressing the issues by taking part in governance. The following issues must be addressed immediately.
Address the constitutional differences specifically the matter of 58(2)(b).
To ensure reconciliation measures in the letter and spirit.
PML- N to rejoin federal cabinet and PPPP to have a cordial working relationship in Punjab.
Steps to ensure inter-provincial harmony by exercising confidence building measures.
To reduce trust deficit among the provinces and federal government.
Address the Balochistan issue instantly by decreasing the feeling of deprivation.
Consensus among the political parties about the operational mechanism to be used in the Northern areas of Pakistan.
Irrespective of the ideological differences it is a high time that national interest must supersede the self interest. Political parties must act as a viable institution to protect the interest of the citizens of Pakistan by assuring unity and national integration.

Maryam Azam & Yawar Hayat Shah

Problems of South Asian Countries by Yawar Hayat Shah & Zamurrad Awan

Problems of South Asian Countries

Pakistan
• Progressive Deterioration of Internal Security
• Terrorism/Extremism/Sectarianism
• Energy Crisis/Limited Energy Resources/High Dependency on imported Furnace Oil/Country wide Power Shortage
• Scarcity of Irrigation Water/ Water Crisis/Mega Water Reservoirs
• Food Shortage (e.g. severe flour shortage)
• Currant Account/ Trade Deficit
• Fiscal Deficit
• High indigenous and foreign debt
• Staggering Unemployment & Poverty
• Inadequate Health Facilities (e.g. High infant/maternal mortality rate)
• Exploitation of Women
• Violation of Human Rights
• No Agricultural taxation
• Droughts and famine
• Adulteration of Fertilizers
• Low growth rates in industry manufacturing and service sector
• Low per-capita income and HDI
• High Population growth rate
• High Defence Budget
• Lack of Foreign Direct Investment
• Frequent disruption of democratic governance due to military coups
• Dynastic Politics
• Absence of internal democracy in Political Parties

Bangladesh
• Frequent Military Take over
• Sharply polarized political environment
• Population Explosion
• Fail to reduce poverty
• Fail in delivery of basic services
• High illiteracy rate
• Low pace of development

India
• Human Rights Abuses
• Insufficient economic growth
• Political challenges slowing down the pace of economic development reforms
• Low per-capita income
• HIV/AIDS pandemic
• Environmental degradation
• High population rate
• Female infanticide
• Communal Violence
• Terrorist incidents
• Separationists and cessationists insurgencies (e.g. Kashmir, Mewos, Nagas, Maos)

Sri-Lanka
• Terrorist insurgency by LTTE
• 18 years old civil war
• Tension with India over Tamil issue
• Ecological Problems

Nepal
• Low per capita income
• High rate of poverty
• Bad governance
• Social injustice
• Distorted distribution of income, wealth and human capital
• Lack of social harmony

Yawar Hayat Shah & Zamurrad Awan

Post-Election Scenario of Pakistani Politics By Yawar Hayat Shah & Zamurrad Awan

The result of polls held on February 18, 2008, has spoken unambiguously the will of the people of Pakistan, in favor of two main stream parties the Pakistan Muslim League and the Pakistan Peoples Party. Theses two parties cherished majority votes in National Assembly as well as in four provincial assemblies. The mainstream parties, PPP and PML (N) along with Pakistan National Alliance joined their hands for a new coalition government. No doubt these parties have their own agendas and manifestos but they united on a single platform in the interest of the whole nation. In the politics of reconciliation for the broader interest of the country, the MQM was also requested to work as coalition partner in the new set up, which was after few deliberations was to be accepted despite of the past rivalries between the PPP and MQM as there is no permanent friend and foe in politics.
The unexpected results of these elections further veil out the fake policies of previous government who left the sever challenges for the new government. The consequences of these policies came out in the form of inflation, whole day black out, suicide bombing, cut back on jobs and last but not the least a national staple from the market. Along with these problems, the demand by ‘pro-active’ lawyers for restoration of judiciary further confronted the situation. The prevailed unrest in country immediately demanded from a democratically elected government with the smooth transfer of power and, no doubt the winning parties tried to make a new set up accordingly. However, the reconciliatory approach of winning parties could not come out with the expected results and the unpleasant events kept on diverting the attentions of new government along with the public. The most objectionable event was the harassment of prominent members of Pakistani Muslim League (Q), former Chief Minister Sindh, Mr Ghulam Arbab Raheem in the Sindh Assembly session, when an angry mob of activists encircled him and hurled abuses on him. Meanwhile one man hit Arbab’s face with a shoe where as other workers did try to hit him with fists and shoes. Similarly, Former Minister of Parliamentary affairs Dr Sher Afgan Niazi was swooped down by the mob apparently showing themselves lawyers, when he was brought out of his advocate office under the secuity of police to rescue. The series of such events was an organized afford from the people who wanted to snuff out democracy.
The former government left the Pakistan’s economy in a quagmire. The socio-economic condition of Pakistan is becoming intense day by day; therefore the state appears rudderless, even in the presence of two major political parties together with their allies in government. From its day first the new government is handicapped by the lawyers’ movement for restoration of judges. The PML (N) included in its manifesto for elections, the restoration of judges the key point, however, thought PPP was in favor of independent judiciary but they did not make any commitment to the people regarding this issue. It’s an ultimate reality that both parties are agreed on the restoration of judges however, the difference is just only on the method of re-instatement of judges. PPP wants a restoration through a constitutional package, conversely PML(N) want the restoration of judiciary first without the compulsion of constitutional package at the same time. Consequently, the most awaited talks between the head of ruling parties ended up on a sad note on 12th May, when PML(N) head Nawaz Sharif decided to quit from the Federal cabinet as he could make his promise to restore judges in the confined time period. While talking to the Press conference, he said that his party would not become a part of any conspiracy against the democratic government and would not strengthen the President Musharraf camp. He further insisted that his party is still in coalition with PPP and would support the government according to the Charter of Democracy.
To get rid of all evils of the former government, newly elected Prime Minster Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani declared a 100 days package after getting the unanimous vote of confidence from the National Assembly. The judicial crisis has crippled the whole governmental machinery. Lawyers have become a pressure group. They have become an obstacle on the way of resolution of other issues which are directly related to the common masses. The restoration of judiciary is a constitutional matter and it will be resolved constitutionally. As Co-chairperson of PPP Asif Ali Zardari has stated that he would not amend an illegal act by another illegal step. PML (N) and lawyers’ community should wait for some time for the restoration of the judiciary. Now lawyers have called for the Long March. That will be the first step of agitation against the newly born government. Though it’s their democratic right but matters should be resolved amicably. On the other hand there is no clear demarcation of powers and authority between the President and the Prime Minister. According to the 1973 constitution, the form of government is parliamentary, however, the tempering with the constitution by the presidency along with his ally parties, the presidential system is working in the country. Where all the powers reside in the office of president, who has already generated strained relations among the institutions. There is no system of checks and balances; consequently, the political system of Pakistan lacks the doctrine of separation of powers. Due to this deficiency the political system is in mayhem. Therefore, the public have serious resentment against the president Musharaff, who despite of the defeat of his ally party PML (Q) in general elections, is not ready to resign.
While keeping in view socio-political vulnerability along with economic deficits of the country, now people are desirous to hear the debate of Finance Minister while presenting the annual budget for the fiscal year of 2008-09. There is a ray of hope; people think that they will get some relief in the upcoming budget as government is saying again and again that next budget will be the people friendly budget. At this point of time people are more concerned about the wheat crisis, energy shortage, increasing inflation and unemployment. The people of Pakistan are desperate and hopeless because of the situation emerging in the country. This situation is resulted in frustration among youth who are the real builders of future. After passing a long journey of education they can not get suitable jobs according to their academic qualifications. Whole system is victim of the corruption, nepotism, red tapism and bribery. Many qualified but poor youngsters have been deprived from their right to job, as the jobs are given to the sons, nephews and relatives of the powerful people. The current situation of Pakistan is same as Thomas Hobbes’ state of nature. Where people were living under the principle of ‘Might is Right’ and there was a ‘perpetual war of everyone against everyone’. The need of hour seeks serious action to tackle immediate issues, which the country is facing. Though the institutional independence is significantly an important demand to deal with, however, there are so many other issues related to the common man of the country, which should be resolve first.

Swat Peace Pact: A Ray of Hope

Pakistan is a front line Non-Nato Ally of US led coalition in the War Against Terrorism. Geo-strategically and Geo-politically Pakistan is a very significant character on the international stage. Pakistan herself also has become the victim of the terrorism. After the merciless incident of September 11, 2001, USA invaded Afghanistan and once again looked towards Pakistan for help as it was facilitated in 1979 against USSR. In December 2001, USA attacked Afghanistan and after few months of resistance Taliban regime was ousted. Taliban is a group of some radical people who believes in extreme and fundamental values and interprets Islam according to its own point of view. They believe in the use of force to spread the message of Islam that is against the true spirit of Islam. Pakistan fought a proxy war in Afghanistan and Jihadis from all over the world came to Pakistan to get training of guerilla war tactics. USA funded Pakistan for the establishment of seminaries to equip the Jihadis against USSR in Afghanistan. Since that time these Jihadis have been settled in the tribal areas of Pakistan along with the border of Afghanistan.

Once it was thought that Taliban has lost all their powers after the fall of Mulla Omer’s regime, but they better equipped, financed and regained strength not only in Afghanistan also in neighbor state Pakistan with the passage of time. In Pakistan, these people are commonly known as the ‘Local Taliban’. Right after the demise of Taliban government in Afghanistan, they started insurgency across the Durand Line in Pakistan. Tribal areas of Pakistan became the hub of terrorist activities. Blame game between both governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan started. Both think that the other country in responsible of terrorism in the whole region.

Pakistan’s previous government deployed its army at the large scale for the first time in the history of Pakistan to crush the terrorist militants in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). A large number of militants and army men lost their lives during the operations. On September 5, 2006, the Waziristan Accord, an agreement between tribal leaders and the government of Pakistan was signed in Miranshah, North Waziristan to end all fighting. But later that agreement could not prove as much fruitful and the insurgency remained continuous. With the passage of time other three agreements were signed but they also faced the same fate. The government of Pakistan launched another military operation in Swat in November 2007 after militants led by Moulana Fazlullah had tried to seize the control of the district and cut off the Karakoram Highway that links Pakistan and China. The culture of terrorism spread all over the country. Killing and suicide bombing became the routine of daily life. Flames of terrorism took the whole country in the lap of spreading fire.

The day when new elected government came into office, the threat of terrorism was haunting it. It is the real threat to the stability of the state. On May 21, 2008 the provincial government of North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) signed a fifteen point peace pact with the local Taliban in Peshawar. The NWFP government was represented by Senior Minister Bashir Ahmed Bilour, Senior Minister Rahimdad Khan, Enviornment Minster Wajid Ali Khan and Awami National Party’s provincial chief Afrasyab Khan. The Taliban militants were represented by Moulana Fazlullah’s aide Muslim Khan, Moulana Mohammad Amin and Ali Bakht. The talks lasted more than six hours.

According to this 15 point peace agreement, the local Taliban has accepted the writ of the government in the region and promised to help the administration to maintain the law and order situation. Taliban has renounced the militancy and terrorism. They have also agreed to eliminate all sources of militancy and stop training suicide bombers. This agreement envisaged a phased withdrawal of troops from the District of Swat and required Moulana Fazlullah’s supporters to stop attacks on security forces, government officials, installations, girls’ schools, CDs shops and barbers shops.

Under the agreement, the government will enforce Sharia Laws in the Malakand division and withdraw cases registered against the Taliban. A joint committee will scrutinize the cases filed against militants, including Moulana Fazlullah. The Imam Dheri seminary which served as the headquarters of the militants will be converted into an Islamic University. No group will be allowed to recruit a private militia. No radio channel will work without the prior permission of Government. Moulana Fazlullah has been allowed to run his controversial radio channel. No one will be allowed to obstruct the polio vaccination schemes in the area. The Taliban will help the action taken by the local authorities against kidnappers, robbers and other criminals. The government will pay the compensation to the people who have lost their relatives in the military operations and whose houses have been damaged.

This peace accord is being considered a very kind step taken by the government and the local Taliban. People have hopes that this agreement will be fruitful for the restoration of the peace in the region. The newly elected government has abandoned the policy of use of force against those people who are ready to sit on the negotiation table. The fifteen point peace agreement was need of the time, as the use of force could not create peaceful environment. It is the first step of the popularly elected government for the conflict resolution through amicable means. Though USA and Afghanistan have reservation on this peace deal but it is the demand of the time that parties to the agreement should follow it for the peace and tranquility in Pakistan.

Dismembered Coalition Reveals the Truth by Yawar Hayat Shah & Zamurrad Awan

The most awaited talks between the head of ruling parties finally ended up on a sad note, as it was feared by a number political pundits that the honeymoon between Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslin League- Nawaz(PML-N)or, more specifically, between Asif Ali Zardari and Nawaz Sharif will not last. Since the government formation has completed, the judicial crisis was seeking an immediate resolution, though the other issues remained a matter of serious concern for the newly elected government.The coalition government promised the nation in the ‘Bhurban Declaration’ that judicial crisis will be solved within thirty days of the creation of the government. Thirty of the April was set as the deadline for the restoration of the judiciary as it was on November 2, 2007. Due to some complexities it would not be happened on the April 30, 2008 and the new deadline was announced in Dubai Talks by both parties that was May 12, 2008.Last fifteen days made an environment of the country more suspicious as the PPP and PML (N) hold discussions for hours together to sort out a way, but both parties told the media that they had failed to bridge differences over the route to take for the reinstatement of the deposed judges. Leadership of both parties was there in London to hold talks on the issue. Despite the last minute intervention of the US Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher, London Talks collapsed.Finally 12th May proved itself a decisive one and PML leaders reached back to Pakistan. After having long meetings with the headship of Pakistan People Party in London, Pakistan Muslim League (N) decided to quit from the federal cabinet. Nawaz sharif while talking with media that his party will not become a part of any conspiracy against the democratic government and will not strengthened the President Musharraf camp. He told the media that his party will sit on the treasury benches and will support the government according to the Charter of Democracy.On the other hand, Co-chairman of PPP Asif Ali Zaradari has requested to Nawaz Sharif through a phone call and requested to hold his decision of resignation from the Federal Government till his return from London. He also has announced that the portfolios of the PML (N) ministers will be kept vacant and no candidate will contest against Nawaz Sharif in by-poll. He advised the Prime Mininster Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani not to accept the resignation of PML (N) ministers. He is confident that the PML ( N) would return to the fold of the coalition soon.PPP’s stance is that an illegal and unconstitutional action cannot be undo by taking equally illegal and unconstitutional step. This domino effect will cause the fall of whole administrative system of the state. Party is reiterating that judiciary will be restored through a resolution in parliament along with a constitutional package that wil ensure the supremacy and independence of the judiciary. PML (N) stressed government that it should announce the reinstatement of deposed judges through an executive order.So it can be analyzed that the differences between the two parties were over the modalities and not on the objective of the restoration of the judiciary. As both parties are still emphasizing that judiciary will be restored as it was promised with the masses of Pakistan,At this point in time, media is playing a role of catalyst, different news channels are telecasting diverse version of news. Every channel is interpreting the issue in its own way to create more ambiguity among the masses. Some News channels had telecasted the news that Nawaz Sharif has declared the end of coalition. In reality he did not talk about the break up of the coalition. In the time of this kind of deadlock media should not play irresponsible role to create a state of disappointment among people. Both leaders have political heads and knew the hopes and aspiration of the people of the land. They are taking steps like shrewd politicians and playing their card tactically. As PPP’s Co-Chairman declared that PPP will continue the support of PML (N) government in Punjab. Therefore, it can be judged that coalition has not come to its end. In fact, the both ruling parties are not in the position to quit the alliance, which is pertinent to sustain democracy in the country.

Yawar Hayat Shah
Zamurrad Awan

Derailed Justice in Pakistan

Judiciary is the most important organ of a government. Judiciary plays very significant role in a state. To provide the justice, judges make sensible decisions after carefully considering the best thing to do. It performs the function of settlement of disputes, interpretation of law, protection of rights. It is usually said that there is no better test for the excellence of a government than the efficiency of its judicial system. An independent judiciary is necessary for securing an unbiased trial of the accused. It protects the rights and liberties of the individuals. Independence of judiciary is essential for the protection of the constitution and the law of the land against encroachment by the government or the citizens.

Since the inception of Pakistan, Judicial system remained in doldrums. It could not enjoy the privilege of independence and impartiality. Political history of Pakistan is full of different kinds of twists. Military intervened in politics for a number of times and Judiciary gave the legal cover to the coups of military dictators under the guise of Doctrine of Necessity. Many times executive organ of the government i.e. President used the sword of 58(2)b to cut the neck of legislature.

On March 09, 2007, two organs of the government, the executive and the judiciary came in the direct confrontation. President terminated the services of the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) and referred the case to the Supreme Judicial Council. Right after that decision whole civil society, lawyers’ community with the support of media poured into the streets and agitated against the suspension of the CJP. After a long struggle, CJP was reinstated on July 20, 2007. On November 03, 2007, when the full bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan was about to disqualify the candidature of Pervez Musharraf for the election of President of Pakistan, he proclaimed emergency in the country. And a Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) was introduced for the fresh oath of the judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan and High Courts of all four provinces. Once again the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Iftikhar Choudhry was told that, ‘his services were no more required to the Government of Pakistan’. All the judges who refused to take oath under PCO were deposed and a new judicial setup was introduced.

This whole episode was played on the political stage rather than legal stage. From the termination of CJP till the proclamation of emergency and so on, each and every step was politically prejudiced and have no solid legal ground. A judge of the court of justice is the person who has its own world. He has nothing to do with the day to day affairs of the town, due to the status of impartiality. A judge speaks through his judgment and does not lead movements. This time judges of the Supreme Court and the high court became the national heroes and came on the road leading public rally that is against the prestige of their status. This judicial issue was cashed by the political parties of Pakistan during the general elections of 2008. Pakistan Muslim League (N) secured the votes in the name of restoration of judiciary. All the political parties played very active role in the struggle for the restoration of judiciary. The way in which deposed judges agitated against the decision of president is not suitable to the decorum of their prestigious office. It will be the acid test of the politicized Justices how they would be able to do justice on the basis of impartiality because they have taken support from the political parties. These parties will expect the favor in different cases. So, the real and urgent need of the time is not only the restoration of the judiciary but also the independence of judiciary. Independent judiciary is the key to the good governance. If judicial system will be free from the pressures it will follow the principle of the Rule of Law, according to which all human beings are considered equal in the eyes of the law. No one will be favored and no one will be victimized.

Bhutto Doctrine & its Implications

On March 29, 2008 after securing unanimous vote of confidence in National Assembly, the twenty-sixth Prime Minster of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani announced the program for the first 100 days of his administration. After a month of the declaration of the 100 days package, the entire nation is looking towards the newly elected government. It is the first litmus test of the popularly elected coalition government how it fulfills the hopes and wishes of the masses. Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani started his public life as Prime Minister of Pakistan by paying tribute to his leader and the founder of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who founded the PPP on November 30, 1967 in Lahore. Pakistan people’s Party was established on the basis of BHUTTO DOCTRINE that was;
(1) Islam is our Faith
(2) Democracy is our Policy
(3) Socialism is our Economy
(4) All powers to the People.

Here we will take a bird’s eye view of the Bhutto Doctrine for the interpretation of the its above given principles.
The first and foremost principle is that Islam is our Faith. It means that people of the sub-continent got a separate homeland in the name of Islam. That is why this newly born state was named as Islamic Republic of Pakistan. This principle indicates that the whole system of government will work on the basis of Islamic teachings. As Islam is a complete code of life and provides proper and comprehensive guideline in each and every walk of life. So it is not right to say that the real spirit of Islam was invigorated in the Zia’s era through his policy of Islamization. It is pertinent to note that Pakistan People’s Party was established on the basis of Islamic belief.

The second belief is ‘Democracy is our Policy’. Democracy is a system in which all the people of a country can vote to elect their representatives and send them to the parliament for the purpose of law making. In the democratic system, institutions are stronger than individuals. Elections are held in time for the best interest of the people. There is freedom of speech and expression. People enjoy the right to criticize the governmental policies without any hesitation. Public opinion plays pivotal role in democracy. Pakistan People’s Party is the only political party in the history of Pakistan which has paid a lot for the sake of democracy. It has sacrificed its two chairpersons, the founding father of PPP, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and his daughter Shaheed Benazir Bhutto, in the struggle for the democracy. The martyrdom of the leaders and the workers of the PPP have brought the change on the political horizon of Pakistan.

Third principle is ‘Socialism is our Economy’. The term socialism is used to refer to a set of political and economic theores based on the belief that everyone has an equal right to share of a country’s wealth and that the government should own and control the main industries. To create the economc equallbrium in the country, socialism was reffered as a penacea of economic inequalities. The concentration of wealth in the hands of twenty two families in the reign of military dictator Ayub Khan pushed the economy of the state in the quagmire. Rich became richer and poor became poorer. To abridge the gap between ‘haves’ and ‘haves not’ this economc policy was propogated.

Fourth principle is ‘All powers to the People’. In Islamic Republic of Pakistan, sovereignity belongs to Allah Almighty and all powers are delegated to the human beings. It is said that “voice of the people is the voice of the God”. People have the power to elect any government and they have the power to dethrone any governmnet. Population is an essential ingredient of a state. That is why people are the hub of the all activities of a state.

If we look at the prism of history of Pakistan while keeping in view this four principled Bhutto Doctrine, we can see that Pakistan People’s Party’s governments could not follow the same due to the premature expiry of the tenure for one reason or the other. Shaheed Benazir Bhutto was popularly elected twice by the people as a premier of Pakistan in 1988 and 1993 respectively. Unfortunately for the both times, the then presidents used the undemocratic powers vested in them by the eighth (8th) amendment made by the military dictator Zia ul Haq. The power to dissolve the National Assembly was given to the president in the Article 58(2)b of the Constitution of Pakistan.

Now being the parliamentary heir of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Benazir Bhutto, it is the responsibility of Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani to follow the Bhutto Doctrine to solve the problems faced by the country at this point of time. This doctrine has solution of all the ills of the society. The country can be developed and prosperous, if the newly elected government follows the teachings of Islam to resolve the different problems as ‘Islam is our Faith’. By following the second principle, ‘Democracy is our Policy’ this government should respect the mandate that is given to them by the people of the Pakistan. It should act in the way that no military dictator can even think to topple down the democratic government. The day Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani took oath of the office of Premiership of Pakistan, economy of Pakistan was facing the worst phase of its history. This government should assure the equal distribution of wealth to make the people of Pakistan prosperous by adopting the code of ‘Socialism is our Economy’. Population is the backbone of a country, so all powers should be vested in them. It is the true spirit of democracy for that PPP’s chairpersons sacrifised their lives. So, government should empower the people of Pakistan who are the real asset and future of the country. Government can achieve its goals and aims of 100 days package, if it works on the princples of Bhutto Doctrine. Because it is comprehensive and very useful doctrine for all times.